The math used in a scientific theory does not allow the scientist to declare new matter or processes; the matter and or processes were always there. For the sake of scientific truth so was the math. Math is not and was not invented by man, only the notations used to record the math were invented by man. Just as the Laws of Nature were preexistent so was the math that governs these laws.
A theory only allows you to deduce a new law of nature from the symmetry of existing laws. If there are no pre-existing laws you can deduce nothing whatsoever. Man did not make the laws of nature; this has never been in dispute by the evolutionist. Man did not invent the math that allows for the understanding of the present laws of nature; this has never been in dispute by the evolutionist.
Since there is no dispute over the basic understanding of the fundamental principles, where is the disagreement? The disagreement is over the fact that there are preexisting laws and every evolutional theory wants to ignore this fact.
There is an elephant in the room, and the DNA demonstrates that the elephant in the room was designed, and the evolutionist in the room was also designed, but unlike the elephant, the evolutionist was also designed to know God…a form of Heavenly humor.
Ro 1:19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. Ro 1:20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. Ro 1:21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Ro 1:22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools…
Published on Friday, May 3, 2013 @ 4:28 AM CDT