There is a mismatch that persists between what we are told about “settled science” and the reality. “Settled science” is a term invented by evolutionist to mislead us into thinking that there is no dispute. History has shown that there is no such thing as settled science, for science is the study of new ideas and theories.
Every scientific idea that we believe today was not believed in the past, and this will be true for the future when new studies unsettles the current so called “settled science”. The evolutionist do not believe in God, and they will do all that they can to mislead. It starts in grade school. It is not the teachers fault; they have also trusted the scientist.
Many investigators feel uneasy about stating in public that the origin of life is a mystery, even though behind closed doors they freely admit that they are baffled. There seems to be two reasons for their unease. First, they feel it opens the door to religious explanations. Second, they worry that a frank admission of ignorance will undermine funding. So scientists are keeping quiet and searching for new directions in which to proceed. [i]
The two reasons can be restated as money and pride. Wanting what is of this world and denying the next.
Psalm10.4 In the pride of his face the wicked does not seek him; all his thoughts are, “There is no God.”
1Tim6.10a For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith…
It is true, no one can prove scientifically that God exist, but science can be honest and state that they also cannot prove that God does not exist. In fact, the scientist could even be so honest as to admit that much of what they claim disproves God is not proof at all…it is theory.
Evolutionists know that they have this origin of life problem. What’s next; admitting that God might exist…not likely. Now they say that the materials for the origin of life where brought here by comets from other planets, because the math demonstrates that there has not been enough time for life as we know it to be formed…not even with billions of years.
Computers have now proven that the math does not work. Life as we have come to understand it with the use of new scientific instruments is too complex to form within the age of the universe much less the age of the earth. They have a problem. With certainty they dated the earth and printed it in textbooks, now they come to find out that they need a lot more time for life to develop in the way they have proposed.
All of their other theories use this same time period so they have to live within that time frame, or all of their other theories fall apart. They now state that comets brought the basic materials of life to earth. This is nothing more than misdirection, for even the age of the universe does not allow enough time for such complexity to have developed into the abundant life we see on earth. Comets fly all over the universe, yet complex life has been discovered on no other planet.
Prov14.1 The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good.
[i] Rana, F., & Ross, H. (2004). Origins of life: Biblical and evolutionary models face off (26). Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress.
Published on Monday, November 18, 2013 @ 5:55 AM CDT